Terry Eagelton’s “The Meaning of Life”, is a roller coaster ride of enlightenment. The premise of the book is really to dissect the language and theories behind the meaning of life question in hopes of gaining a clearer perspective of what the question is truly asking and in which ways it can be answered. Eagelton sites theories by Nietzsche, Hagel, Wittenstein, Schopenhauer, Kafka, and others regarding the social implications and true delineation of life’s meaning. He engages the reader by sighting these contradictory theories in hopes that one will expand on their perception of life and begin to question their, perhaps slightly misguided, personal interpretation. Often among the citizens of our current society the answer to the meaning of life question is usually typified in one word; love, money, happiness, etcetera. This may seem a bit stifling considering the magnitude of the question. Really, the meaning of life can be summed up in one word! Well, where were all these brilliant civilian philosophers at the turn of the century when such questions were being scrutinized? We could have saved civilization a lot of precious time if it were only that simple.
If fact, Eagelton theorizes, that the meaning of life is a culmination of all the many attributes of the human condition, not just one. He also suggests that, “perhaps the meaning of life is not some goal to be pursued, or some chunk of truth to be dredged up, but something which is articulated in the act of living itself, or perhaps in a certain way of living”. There in fact may not be a crystallized answer to the question but rather a method in which meaning is inspired. If the meaning of life is truly understood through the act of living; in what manner of living should we be striving for which would produce such meaning?
Many would suggest that life’s meaning is a personal, individual, pursuit. We are like sponges absorbing meaning from our experiences and from those experiences deriving a method in which we pursue more meaningful experiences; the culmination of which is a personal interpretation of a meaningful life. Could that be it? Could that be everything? I would venture to say No! It is naïve to think that we as humans are to interact amongst each other and gain only a personal meaning. While I can’t reconcile whether there is one solitary meaning which encompasses all human existence, I will say there must be a reason why we are such social creature and would suggest that our very being and meaning is derived from our interconnectivity. Our need and social obligation toward interconnectivity must provide a larger piece or our life’s meaning. Like Eagalton, I believe that the key to life’s meaning does not lay in the culmination of our individual experience rather the effect that our individual experiences have on the world.